Judge Bars Immigration Arrests At US Courthouses In A Setback For Trump

World

The ruling is the second setback for courthouse arrests since May when a federal judge in New York barred them at immigration courts.

By Associated Press Published: 2026-06-24T08:34:00+04:00 2 min read

After Trump took office, hearings across the country often ended with cases being dismissed by the government, setting the stage for plainclothes agents to make arrests in hallways. (Image for illustrative purposes only)

After Trump took office, hearings across the country often ended with cases being dismissed by the government, setting the stage for plainclothes agents to make arrests in hallways. (Image for illustrative purposes only)

A judge on Tuesday barred the federal government from making arrests at immigration courts, ordering an end to a practice that took hold shortly after President Donald Trump took office last year.

The Trump administration's reversal of long-standing policy against arrests at immigration court resulted "not from merely unreasoned decision-making but a complete lack of decision-making,” wrote U.S. District Judge Casey Pitts of San Francisco. Authorities failed to address the "chilling effect” of arrests on whether people attend court hearings.

"For 80 years, Congress has commanded federal agencies to think before they act,” wrote Pitts, referring to the Administrative Procedure Act, a 1946 law that requires federal agencies to justify its actions. That law, he wrote, "does not require an agency to make the choice that a reviewing court might deem preferable.

But it demands that an agency at least provide sound reasons for following its chosen course."

The ruling is the second setback for courthouse arrests since May when a federal judge in New York barred them at immigration courts. That order applied only in New York, while the latest decision invalidated the policy nationwide.

James Percival, the U.S. Homeland Security Department's general counsel, criticized the ruling as an exercise in judicial overreach.

"When a judge sentences a defendant, the defendant is taken into custody. If an alien is ordered removed by an immigration judge, the same should happen. A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda,” Percival wrote online.

After Trump took office, hearings across the country often ended with cases being dismissed by the government, setting the stage for plainclothes agents to make arrests in hallways in coordination with attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security.

Pitts, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, faulted the administration for carrying out the arrests and for holding people in nearby cells for longer than a prescribed 12-hour limit.

RECENT NEWS

New Global Rules Clear Road For Driverless Vehicles

New York: A UN vehicle standards forum has approved the first global regulations for fully autonomous driving systems (... Read more

Donald Trump Avenue In Hyderabad Sparks Political Backlash Amid Strained US-India Ties

HYDERABAD: A key road named after U.S. President Donald Trump in India's opposition-ruled tech hub of Hyderabad has dra... Read more

France Confirms First Ebola Case In Doctor Returning From Congo Humanitarian Mission

PARIS: A ​doctor returning from ‌a humanitarian ​mission in Congo has tested positive for Ebola, the country's fi... Read more

Mexico, Like The US, Extends Birthright Citizenship To Children Born On Its Soil

TIJUANA, Mexico: Vivianne Petit Frere's brightly painted Haitian restaurant sits blocks from the towering U.S. border w... Read more

Alibaba Sues US For Being Linked To Chinese Military

Alibaba, the Chinese technology and e-commerce giant, sued the U.S. government on Tuesday over being placed on a list o... Read more

Huge Viking Age Textile Production Site Discovered In Søften, Denmark

SØFTEN, Denmark: Archaeologists have discovered a huge Viking Age textile production site in Denmark that dates back m... Read more