Justice Department Asks Court To Drop Microsoft Email Case
US Solicitor General urges the Supreme Court to set aside a federal appeals court decision in Microsoft’s favour
Washington: The Trump administration asked the US Supreme Court to drop a pending case over government access to emails stored overseas, saying a new federal law has stripped the case of any practical significance.
The law, enacted March 23 as part of the massive spending bill, lays out rules for international data requests by law enforcement. It gives tech companies an easier way to navigate conflicts between government demands and customer privacy expectations.
The Supreme Court case, which the justices heard in February, stemmed from the government’s use of a 1986 law to seek emails from an unidentified account kept on a Microsoft Corp. server in Ireland. The Justice Department said the messages would provide evidence of drug trafficking.
The Justice Department said in a court filing made public Saturday that it has obtained a fresh warrant for the information under the new law. US. Solicitor General Noel Francisco said the Supreme Court should send the dispute back to a lower court so that the case could be dismissed as legally moot.
Francisco also urged the Supreme Court to set aside a federal appeals court decision in Microsoft’s favour so that it doesn’t “generate uncertainty.”
Pre-Internet Statute
The Justice Department and Microsoft both supported the new measure, the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act. The Cloud Act, as it’s known, makes clear that US warrants apply around the world and clarifies what data the government can access. It sets up a new process for providers to challenge US warrants and notify foreign governments so they can object.
The measure also creates rules for American companies when they receive information requests from foreign governments. The US will be able to make agreements with other nations governing access.
During arguments, some justices suggested they would prefer letting Congress address the issue rather than resolving it based on a statute that predates the widespread adoption of the internet.
The case is United States v. Microsoft, 17-2.

Aqua Labs Backs UAEs Vision 2030 With Launch Of $20mn Startup Fund
The programme invites founders worldwide to apply for funding, mentorship, and access to Web3 infrastructure The post A... Read more
Alpha Dhabi Sells 8.5% Modon Stake To Abu Dhabi Governments Limad Holding
The wholly owned entity of the Abu Dhabi Government now owns majority share in Modon after buying IHC and ADQ stakes as... Read more
ADNOC Distribution Delivers Its Strongest EBITDA Since IPO For Q3
Quarterly EBITDA of $319mn is the highest ever, up 15.9%; Net profit surged to $221mn, up 21.5%; Record 9M fuel volumes... Read more
PIF Spending Shift To Spur Greenfield FDI In Saudi As Private Equity Expands
Bain’s Gregory Garnier says Saudi's sovereign wealth fund is entering a more disciplined phase, redirecting capital f... Read more
EXCLUSIVE: SEDCO Capital Listing Possible Within 3 Years, CEO Says Amid Saudi IPO Boom
CEO Rayyan Nagadi says the group’s investment arm could go public within 3 years, as Saudi Arabia’s buoyant IPO mar... Read more
Tabby Completes Secondary Share Sale At $4.5 Billion Valuation
The transaction involved HSG, Boyu Capital and other investors acquiring shares from existing shareholders The post Tab... Read more